Corpus of Electronic Texts Edition
Labour in Irish History (Author: James Connolly)
Chapter 13
Chapter XIII
Our Irish Girondins Sacrifice The Irish Peasantry Upon The Altar Of Private Property
There is a class of Revolutionists named Girondins
whose fate in history is remarkable enough. Men who rebel, and urge the lower classes
to rebel, ought to have other than formulas to go upon. Men who
discern in the misery of the toiling, complaining millions, not misery
but only a raw material which can be wrought upon and traded in for
one's own poor hide-bound theories and egoisms, to whom millions of
living fellow-creatures with beating hearts in their
bosomsbeating, suffering, hopingare masses, mere explosive masses, for blowing down Bastilles with, for voting at hustings for us, such men are of the questionable species.Thomas Carlyle.
The outbreak of the famine, which commenced on a small scale in
1845, and increased in area and intensity until 1849, brought to a
head the class antagonism in Ireland, of which the rupture with the
trades was one manifestation, and again revealed the question of
property as the test by which the public conduct is regulated, even
when those men assume the garb of revolution. Needless to say, this is
not the interpretation of the history of that awful period we are
given by the orthodox Irish or English writers upon the subject. Irish
Nationalists of all stripes and English critics of every variety
agree, with wonderful unanimity, in ascribing a split in the Repeal
Association which led to the formation by the seceders of the body
known as the Irish Confederation to the
academic question of whether force might or might not be employed to
achieve a political end. The majority of the Repeal Association,
p.144
we are told, subscribed to the principle enunciated by
O'Connell that the greatest sublunary blessings were not worth the
shedding of a single drop of human blood, and John Mitchel, Father
Meehan, Gavan Duffy, Thomas Francis Meagher, Devin Reilly, William
Smith O'Brien, Fintan Lalor, and others repudiated that doctrine, and
on this point of purely theoretical divergence the secession from
O'Connell took place. It is difficult to believe that any large number
of Irishmen ever held such a doctrine seriously; it is quite certain
that the Irish Catholic priesthood, O'Connell's chief lieutenants, did
not hold nor counsel such a doctrine during the Tithe War. O'Connell
himself had declared that he would willingly join in helping England
in bringing down the American eagle in its highest pride of
flight, which surely would have involved war, and in the House of
Commons on one occasion, in reply to Lord Lyndhurst, who had
characterised the Irish as aliens in blood, in language, and in
religion, Richard Lalor Shiel, a champion of O'Connellism, had
delivered a magnificent oration vaunting the prowess of Irish soldiers
in the English army. In passing we note that Shiel considered the
above phrase of Lord Lyndhurst an insult; modern Irish Nationalists
triumphantly assert the idea, embodied in that phrase, as the real
basis of Irish nationalism.
Nor yet were the seceders, the Young Irelanders as they were
called, in favour of physical force, save as a subject for flights in
poetry and oratory. In reality the secession took place on a false
issue; the majority on either side being disinclined to admit, even if
they recognised, the real issue dividing them. That issue was the old
and ever-present one of the Democratic principle in human society versus the Aristocratic. The Young Irelanders,
young and enthusiastic, felt the force of the Democratic principle
then agitating European society, indeed the very name of Young Ireland
was an adaptation of the names used by the Italian revolutionist
Mazzini for the revolutionary
p.145
associations, Young Italy, Young Switzerland, Young
France, and Young Germany, he founded after the year 1831. And as the
progress of the revolutionary movement on the Continent, (accompanied
as it was by the popularisation of Socialistic ideas among the
revolutionary masses) synchronised with the falling apart of the
social system in Ireland owing to the famine, the leaders of the Young
Ireland party responded to and moved along with the revolutionary
current of events without ever being able to comprehend the depth and
force of the stream upon whose surface they were embarked. The truth
of this is apparent to all who study their action when at last the
long talked of day-for-revolution had arrived. By that time, 1848,
Ireland was in the throes of the greatest famine in her history.
A few words explanatory of that famine may not be amiss to some of
our readers. The staple food of the Irish peasantry was the potato;
all other agricultural produce, grains and cattle, was sold to pay the
landlord's rent. The ordinary value of the potato crop was yearly
approximately twenty million pounds in English money; in 1848, in the
midst of the famine the value of agricultural produce in Ireland was
£44,958,120. In that year the entire potato crop was a failure,
and to that fact the famine is placidly attributed, yet those figures
amply prove that there was food enough in the country to feed double
the population, were the laws of capitalist society set aside, and
human rights elevated to their proper position. It is a common saying
amongst Irish Nationalists that Providence sent the potato blight;
but England made the famine. The statement is true, and only needs
amending by adding that England made the famine by a rigid
application of the economic principles that lie at the base of
capitalist society. No man who accepts capitalist society and the
laws thereof can logically find fault with the statesmen of England
for their acts in that awful period. They stood for the rights of
property and free competition,
p.146
and philosophically accepted their consequences upon
Ireland; the leaders of the Irish people also stood for the rights of
property, and refused to abandon them even when they saw the
consequences in the slaughter by famine of over a million of the Irish
toilers. The first failure of the potato crop took place in 1845, and
between September and December of that year 515 deaths from hunger
were registered, although 3,250,000 quarters of wheat and numberless
cattle had been exported. From that time until 1850 the famine spread,
and the exports of food continued. Thus in 1848 it was estimated that
300,000 persons died of hunger and 1,826,132 quarters of wheat and
barley were exported. Typhus fever, which always follows on the heels
of hunger, struck down as many as perished directly of famine, until
at last it became impossible in many districts to get sufficient
labourers with strength enough to dig separate graves for the dying.
Recourse was had to famine pits, into which the bodies were thrown
promiscuously; whole families died in their miserable cabins, and lay
and rotted there, and travellers in remote parts of the country often
stumbled upon villages in which the whole population had died of
hunger. In 1847, black '47, 250,000 died of
fever; 21,770 of starvation. Owing to the efforts of emigration agents
and remittances sent from relatives abroad in the same year, 89,783
persons embarked for Canada. They were flying from hunger, but they
could not fly from the fever that follows in the wake of hunger, and
6,100 died and were thrown overboard on the voyage, 4,100 died on
their arrival in Canada, 5,200 in hospitals, and 1,900 in interior
towns.
Great Britain was nearer than America, and many who could not
escape to America rushed to the inhospitable shores of Britain; but
pressure was brought to bear upon the steamship companies, and they
raised the rates upon all passengers by steerage to an almost
prohibitive price. In this flight to England occurred one of the most
fearful tragedies of all history, a
p.147
tragedy which, in our opinion, surpasses that of the Black
Hole of Calcutta in its accumulation of fearful and gruesome horrors.
On December 2, 1848, a steamer left
Sligo with 200 steerage passengers on board bound for Liverpool. On
that bleak north-western coast such a passage is at all times rough,
and storms are both sudden and fierce. Such a storm came on during the
night, and as the unusual number of passengers crowded the deck the
crew unceremoniously and brutally drove them below decks, and battened
down the hatches to prevent their re-emergence. In the best of weather
the steerage of such a coasting vessel is, even when empty of human
freight, foul, suffocating and unbearable; the imagination fails to
realise what it must have been on that awful night when 200 poor
wretches were driven into its depths. To add to the horror, when some
of the more desperate beat upon the hatches and demanded release, the
mate, in a paroxysm of rage, ordered tarpaulin to be thrown across the
opening to stifle their cries. It did stifle the cries, it also
excluded the air and the light, and there in that inferno those 200
human beings fought, struggled and gasped for air while the elements
warred outside and the frail tub of a ship was tossed upon the surface
of the waters. At last, when some one stronger than the rest managed
to break through and reach the deck, he confronted the ship's officers
with the news that their brutality had made them murderers, that grim
death was reaping his harvest amongst the passengers. It was too true.
Out of the 200 passengers battened down below decks, 72, more than a
third of the entire number, had expired, suffocated for want of air or
mangled to death in the blind struggle of despair in the darkness.
Such is the tale of that voyage of the ship Londonderry, surely the most
horrible tale of the sea in the annals of any white people!
Amidst such conditions the Irish Confederation had been preaching
the moral righteousness of rebellion, and discoursing learnedly in
English to a starving people, the most of whom
p.148
knew only Irish, about the historical examples of Holland,
Belgium, Poland, and the Tyrol. A few men, notably John Mitchel, James
Fintan Lalor, and Thomas Devin Reilly, to their credit be it said,
openly advocated, as the first duty of the people, the refusal to pay
rents, the retention of their crops to feed their own families, and
the breaking-up of bridges and tearing-up of railroad lines, to
prevent the removal of food from the country. Had such advice been
followed by the Young Irelanders as a body it would, as events showed,
have been enthusiastically adopted by the people at large, in which
event no force in the power of England could have saved landlordism or
the British Empire in Ireland. As explained by Fintan Lalor, the
keenest intellect in Ireland in his day, it meant the avoidance of all
pitched battles with the English army, and drawing it into a struggle
along lines and on a plan of campaign where its discipline, training,
and methods would be a hindrance rather than a help, and where no
mobilisation, battalion-drilling nor technical knowledge of military
science was required of the insurgent masses. In short, it involved a
social and a national revolution, each resting upon the other. But the
men who advocated this were in a hopeless minority, and the chiefs of
the Young Irelanders were as rabidly solicitous about the rights of
the landlord as were the chiefs of the English Government. While the
people perished, the Young Irelanders talked, and their talk was very
beautiful, thoroughly grammatical, nicely polished, and the proper
amount of passion introduced always at the proper psychological
moment. But still the people perished. Eventually the Government
seized upon the really dangerous manthe man who had hatred of
injustice deeply enough rooted to wish to destroy it at all costs, the
man who had faith enough in the masses to trust a revolutionary
outbreak to their native impulses, and who possessed the faculty of
combining thought with action, John Mitchell. With his arrest the
people looked for immediate revolution,
p.149
so did the Government, so did Mitchel himself. All were
disappointed. John Mitchel was carried off to penal servitude in Van
Diemen's Land (Tasmania) after scornfully refusing to sign a manifesto
presented to him in his cell by Thomas Francis Meagher and others,
counselling the people not to attempt to rescue
him. The working class of Dublin and most of the towns were clamouring
for their leaders to give the word for a rising; in many places in the
country the peasantry were acting spontaneously. Eventually news
reached Dublin in July, 1848, that warrants were issued for the arrest
of the chiefs of the Young Ireland party. They determined to appeal to
the country. But everything had to be done in a respectable manner; English army on one side,
provided with guns, bands, and banners; Irish army on the other side,
also provided with guns, bands and banners, serried ranks with glittering steel, no mere
proletarian insurrection, and no interference with the rights of
property. When C. G. Duffy was arrested on Saturday, 9th of July, in Dublin, the Dublin workers
surrounded the military escort on the way to the prison at Newgate,
stopped the carriage, pressed up to Duffy and offered to begin the
insurrection then and there. Do you wish to be rescued? said
one of the leaders. Certainly not, said Duffy. And the puzzled
toilers fell back and allowed the future Australian Premier to go to
prison. In Cashel, Tipperary, Michael Doheny was arrested. The people
stormed the jail and rescued him. He insisted upon giving himself up
again and applied for bail. In Waterford Meagher was arrested. As he
was being taken through the city, guarded by troops, the people
erected a barricade in the way across a narrow bridge over the River
Suir, and when the carriage reached the bridge some cut the traces of
the horses and brought the cavalcade to a standstill. Meagher ordered
them to remove the barricade; they begged him to give the word for
insurrection and they would begin then and there. The important city
was in their
p.150
hands, but Meagher persisted in going with the soldiers,
and the poor working-class rebels of Waterford let him go, crying out
as they did so, You will regret it, you will regret it, and it is
your own fault. Meagher afterwards proved himself a fearless
soldier of a regular army, but as an insurgent he lacked the necessary
initiative.
But the crowning absurdity of all was the leadership of William
Smith O'Brien. He wandered through the country telling the starving
peasantry to get ready, but refusing to allow them to feed themselves
at the expense of the landlords who had so long plundered, starved,
and evicted them; he would not allow his followers to seize upon the
carts of grain passing along the roads where the people were dying of
want of food; at Mullinahone he refused to allow his followers to fell
trees to build a barricade across the road until they had asked
permission of the landlords who owned the trees; when the people of
Killenaule had a body of dragoons entrapped between two barricades he
released the dragoons from their dangerous situation upon their leader
assuring him that he had no warrant for his (O'Brien's) arrest; in
another place he surprised a party of soldiers in the Town Hall with
their arms taken apart for cleaning purposes, and instead of
confiscating the arms, he told the soldiers that their arms were as
safe as they would be in Dublin Castle.
When we remember the state of Ireland then, with her population
perishing of famine, all the above recital reads like a page of comic
opera. Unfortunately it is not; it is a page from the blackest period
of Ireland's history. Reading it, we can understand why Smith O'Brien
has a monument in Dublin, although Fintan Lalor's name and writings
have been boycotted for more than fifty years. W. A. O'Connor, B.A.,
in his History of the Irish People, sums up Smith O'Brien's career thus:The man had broken up a peaceful organisation in the cause of war, promised war to a people in desperate strait,
p.151
went into the country to wage war, then considered it guilt to do any act of war. It must, of course, be conceded that Smith O'Brien was a man of high moral probity, but it is equally necessary to affirm that he was a landlord, vehemently solicitous for the rights of his class, and allowing his solicitude for those rights to stand between the millions of the Irish race and their hopes of life and freedom. It ought, however, also be remembered, in extenuation of his conduct in that awful crisis, that he had inherited vast estates as the result of the social, national, and religious
apostacy of his forefathers, and in view of such an ancestry, it is
more wonderful that he had dreamed of rebellion than that he had
repudiated revolution.
Had Socialist principles been applied to Ireland in those days not
one person need have died of hunger, and not one cent of charity need
have been subscribed to leave a smirch upon the Irish name. But all
except a few men had elevated landlord property and capitalist
political economy to a fetish to be worshipped, and upon the altar of
that fetish Ireland perished. At the lowest computation 1,225,000
persons died of absolute hunger; all of these were sacrificed upon the
altar of capitalist thought.
Early in the course of the famine the English Premier, Lord John
Russell, declared that nothing must be done to interfere with private
enterprise or the regular course of trade, and this was the settled
policy of the Government from first to last. A Treasury Minute of August 31,
1846, provided that depots for the sale of food were to be
established at Longford, Banagher, Limerick, Galway, Waterford, and
Sligo, and subordinate depots at other places on the western
coast, but the rules provided that such depots were not to be
opened where food could be obtained from private dealers, and, when
opened, food was to be sold at prices which would permit of private
dealers competing. In all the Acts establishing relief works, it was
stipulated that all the labour must be entirely
p.152
unproductive, so as not to prevent capitalists making a
profit either then or in the future. Private dealers made fortunes
ranging from £40,000 to £80,000. In 1845 a Commissariat
Relief Department was organised to bring in Indian Corn for sale in
Ireland, but none was to be sold until all private
stores were sold out: the State of Massachusetts hired an
American ship-of-war, the Jamestown, loaded it with grain, and
sent it to Ireland; the Government placed the cargo in storage,
claiming that putting it on the market would disturb trade. A Poor
Relief Bill in 1847 made provision for the employment of labour on
public works, but stipulated that none should be employed who retained
more than a quarter of an acre of land; this induced tens of thousands
to surrender their farms for the sake of a bite to eat, and saved the
landlords all the trouble and expense of eviction. When this had been
accomplished to a sufficient extent 734,000 persons were discharged,
and as they had given up their farms to get employment on the works
they were now as helpless as men on a raft in mid-ocean. Mr. Mulhall,
in his Fifty Years of National Progress, estimates the number of persons evicted between
1838 and 1888 as 3,668,000; the greater number of these saw their
homes destroyed during the years under consideration, and this Poor
Relief Bill, nick-named an Eviction-Made-Easy-Act, was one main weapon for their undoing. In 1846, England,
hitherto a Protectionist country, adopted Free Trade, ostensibly in
order to permit corn to come freely and cheaply to the starving Irish.
In reality, as Ireland was a corn and grain exporting country, the
measure brought Continental agricultural produce to England into
competition with that of Ireland, and hence, by lowering agricultural
prices, still further intensified the misery of the Irish producing
classes. The real meaning of the measure was that England, being a
manufacturing nation, desired to cheapen food in order that its wage-slaves might remain content with low wages, and indeed one of the most
immediate results
p.153
of free trade in England was a wholesale reduction of the
wages of the manufacturing proletariat.
The English capitalist class, with that hypocrisy that everywhere
characterises the class in its public acts, used the misery of the
Irish as a means to conquer the opposition of the English landlord
class to free trade in grains, but in this, as in every other measure
of the famine years, they acted consistently upon the lines of
capitalist political economy. Within the limits of that social system
and its theories their acts are unassailable and unimpeachable; it is
only when we reject that system, and the intellectual and social
fetters it imposes, that we really acquire the right to denounce the
English administration of Ireland during the famine as a colossal
crime against the human race. The non-socialist Irish man or woman who
fumes against that administration is in the illogical position of
denouncing an effect of whose cause he is a supporter. That cause was
the system of capitalist property. With the exception of those few men
we have before named, the Young Ireland leaders of 1848 failed to rise
to the grandeur of the opportunity offered them to choose between
human rights and property rights as a basis of nationality, and the
measure of their failure was the measure of their country's
disaster.
p.154